| |||||
| CLEAR Institute Monthly Newsletter | |||||
| Breaking New Ground in the Treatment of Scoliosis! | |||||
|
News Clip on CLEAR Doctor Still Not Convinced! First, it has been universally recognized in recent years that attempting to attribute a genetic basis to any disease is an exercise in futility. While there may be such a thing as a genetic predisposition, the presence of a genetic marker for a specific disease is in no way a guarantee that the carrier will ever express that particular gene. An article featured in the July 2005 issue of Scientific American, entitled, "Identical Twins Exhibit Differences in Gene Expression," is an appropriate confirmation of this concept (read this article at: http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=0001616A-93A1-12C5-93A183414B7F0000). Even amongst identical twins, gene expression differs over one-third of the time.
Second, an entire branch of genetics, termed "epigenetics," has arisen to describe the environmental factors that regulate the repression or expression of particular genomes. An excellent article on epigenetics that delineates the inherent difficulties involved in prescribing a genetic basis to disease was written by Richard C. Strohman at the University of California, Berkeley, excerpted below:
"The major assumptions of biomedicine [may be listed] as follows:
These assumptions underlie the human genome project, the multi-billion dollar national project to sequence, clone, and map the 100,000 genes in the 23 pairs of human chromosomes. But fundamental rules governing population genetics stand in at least partial opposition to the uniqueness equation and to the assumptions. Essentially, the unique relationship between genes and phenotypes is flawed because most complex phenotypes (including diseases) have a unique genetic basis. Rather the relationship between genome and phenome is characterized by great complexity involving interaction between many genes, gene products and environmental signaling. This interaction may involve 10, 100, 1,000 or more genes for any common disease like cancer or the heart diseases. In addition, the interaction will be function of personal natural history and present environmental setting, so that even in simplified cases, where genetic connections may be traced, the genes will have different effects in different environments. Population genetics shows that a precipitating environment is required to produce disease manifestation across the entire range of genetic variation. For cardiovascular disease, most cancers, non-insulin-dependent diabetes, and most mental diseases, there is no evidence for single-gene causality -- and certainly none that would support the uniqueness equation. Disease natural history conflicts with genetic determinism. Diseases determined at fertilization, as Thomas McKeown has made clear, are based in genetic abnormalities of one kind or another. Examples are sickle cell anemia, cystic fibrosis, and Duchenne muscular dystrophy. There are literally thousands of these diseases, but they occur within the human population at extremely low frequency and account for less than 2 per cent of our total disease load. So, only 2 per cent of the time does the 'bad gene causes disease' mechanism operate, while 98 per cent of the time humans are born with genetic constitutions capable of supporting a life span of over 100 years, an average life expectancy of about 85 years, and an old age relatively free of morbidity. The human genome needs to find itself in an environment for which it has adequate representation - proper nutrition, housing, and sanitation, to name the obvious requirements - but the deterministic/mechanistic model of sabotage from within is not adequate to explain most human diseases."
The full article is available at: http://www.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?type=doc&id=273&cn=0&clnt%3Dclnt00001&
There is also an excellent explanation of epigenetics on the Johns Hopkins website: http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/press/2002/November/epigenetics.htm
Another excellent article on environment influencing the expression of genes can be found online at www.mercola.com:
The bottom line is, even if a genetic link to scoliosis is discovered, the question of why it is expressed in certain individuals and not in others remains to be solved.
"Birth in America," by Dolly Garnecki In her article, "Birthing in America," she describes how, for the first time in four decades, infant mortality is on the rise in the United States. Our modern-day system of pharmacological & surgical intervention in the normal birthing process has subjected the most innocent of our society to undue harm, trauma, & even death. Challenging the assumption that hospitals are the only safe places to have a baby is a study, mentioned in an excerpt from her article below, that comes terrifyingly close to demonstrating the exact opposite:
"The largest prospective study of planned home birth with a direct-entry midwife indicates that homebirth is as safe as hospital birth for women with low risk pregnancies, yet home birth accrues a much lower rate of medical interventions, including Cesarean section. Planning a home birth attended by a Certified Professional Midwife (CPM) offers as safe an outcome for low-risk mothers and babies as does a hospital birth. This study is the largest yet of its kind. The researchers used prospective data on more than 5400 planned home births in the
The researchers analyzed outcomes and medical interventions for planned home births, including transports to hospital care, mortality rate, medical intervention during labor, breast feeding and maternal satisfaction and compared these results to the outcomes of 3,360,868 low risk hospital births.10 Findings include: • 88% of the women birthed at home, while 12% transferred to a hospital. • 97% of over 500 participants who were randomly contacted to validate birth outcomes reported that they were extremely or very satisfied with the care they received. For a subsequent birth, 90% said they would choose the same midwife, 9% another certified professional midwife, and 1% another type of caregiver." If you are interested in learning more about the advantages of natural, midwife-assisted deliveries outside of a hospital setting, please contact care@clear-institute.com for a free copy of the full article.
Phrenology?... Not Quite! Dr. Roger Turner of the CATS Workshop seminar series has disproven the centuries-old, mistakenly-held belief that the bones of the skull fuse after childhood, and cannot be moved. EEG studies performed as a patient was being adjusted by Dr. Turner have confirmed changes in brain-wave activity, verified by changes in clinical dianoses & physical evaluations, and further clinical research has demonstrated that misalignments of the cranial bones can affect the neurophysiology of the brain & spinal cord. Combining our clinical observations of scoliosis patients with Dr. Turner's groundbreaking new work has already resulted in the identification of a common pattern: roughly seventy percent of the time, a scoliosis patient will present with a left occipital bulge, a right parietal frontal indent, and a left translation of the sphenoid. Pathological correlations to this finding will most certainly be given a top priority in our continued research efforts & future collaborations with Dr. Turner in regards to scoliosis treatment.
For those interested in finding out more information about Dr. Turner's Cranial Adjusting technique, please go online to www.catsworkshop.com.
Scoliosis World |
|
Written by A. Joshua Woggon.
Permission freely granted to copy & distribute without financial gain.
Please give due credit to : www.clear-institute.com |